Find us on Facebook

alcohol health alliance uk

Cuts in alcohol duty linked to 2000 more alcohol-related deaths


Bottles of beer

Posted 11/10/19

Government cuts to alcohol taxes have had tragic consequences for public health, including nearly 2,000 more alcohol-related deaths in England since 2012, according to new research out today. The findings come as Chancellor Sajid Javid considers whether to cut or raise alcohol duty in the forthcoming Budget.

The research, carried out by the University of Sheffield’s School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), modelled the impact of the UK Government’s decision to abolish the alcohol duty escalator in 2013; a policy which had previously seen alcohol prices rise at 2 per cent above annual inflation rates.

Since then the Government has also frozen and made further cuts to alcohol duty, leading to lower prices and ensuring shop-bought alcohol is more affordable than at any time in the past 30 years.

Separate figures for the North East show alcohol results in around 1,500 deaths a year (2017) while it costs the NHS £209 million a year for services such as hospital admissions, A&E attendances, ambulance callouts and treatment for alcohol dependency (2015-16).

Colin Shevills, Director of Balance, said: “We already know that cheap alcohol is putting intolerable pressure on our NHS and on our police forces. We know that pubs say they see little benefit from duty cuts. But these figures now show the dramatic consequences of lives being lost as a result, with people in poorer communities suffering the most. We have the worst rate of alcohol related deaths in the country here in the North East.

“Alcohol misuse is the biggest risk factor for death, ill-health and disability among 15-49 year-olds in the UK and duty cuts are fuelling the problem while the alcohol industry benefits from around £1bn in alcohol duty cuts every year. This is money that could fund the NHS, our police forces and our schools.

“We are calling on the Government to think again about the impact cheap alcohol is having on the nation’s health.”

The Sheffield Alcohol Research Group - based at ScHARR - modelled the impact of changes to alcohol duty policy from 2012, using data on alcohol consumption, consumer spending habits, consumer and supplier responses to duty changes, alcohol related hospital admissions and deaths, health inequalities, costs to the NHS and those associated with alcohol-related crime and workplace absence.

Senior Research Fellow at the Alcohol Research Group, Colin Angus, said: “We modelled the impact of the cuts to alcohol duties since 2012 and found that this has led to a one per cent rise in alcohol consumption and an increase of almost 2,000 alcohol-related deaths in England between 2012 and 2019, compared to if the alcohol escalator had remained in place until 2015 as originally planned.”

“Due to the complex relationship between alcohol and health, the effects of government duty policy since 2012 will continue to be seen for many years into the future, estimated to be as high as 9,000 additional deaths by 2032."

The group found the knock-on effects of these cuts has been an increase of over 61,000 hospital admissions since 2012 at a cost to the NHS of £317m, an estimated additional 111,000 instances of alcohol-related crime and an economic value of £58 million in lost working days for businesses in England.

“In comparison, Scotland introduced Minimum Unit Pricing (MUP) for alcohol in 2018. Modelling the combined effect of and the changes in alcohol duty we estimate that the positive impacts of MUP outweigh the negative impact of cutting duty, with consumption reducing overall by 5.2% since 2012.

“While our analysis shows that we expect MUP in Scotland to reduce alcohol-related harm, we still estimated there were 250 more alcohol-related deaths and higher levels of hospital admissions, crime and workplace absence, than if the escalator had remained in place.”

The group also found that the people most affected by the changes to alcohol duties are those living in the most deprived communities, affected by disproportionate levels of alcohol-related harm. Analysis of the data revealed that cuts to alcohol duties are likely to have widened health inequalities between the most and least well-off in society, whereas keeping a duty escalator in place would likely have narrowed this gap.

This arises as a greater proportion of the price of cheaper alcoholic drinks, consumed particularly by heavier drinkers from deprived groups, is made up of alcohol duties. As a result, these drinkers are more sensitive to changes in alcohol taxes and therefore the additional deaths arising from cuts to alcohol duty are disproportionately represented in these communities.

“Abolishing the duty escalator has had the greatest impact on drinkers from the most deprived communities, across the board for all of the outcomes the group modelled. Whereas, unlike England, the introduction of the MUP in Scotland in 2018 has likely narrowed inequalities in health,” said Colin.

The research also looked at the health and other benefits that would arise from reintroducing the duty escalator now. They estimate that this would reduce alcohol consumption in England to 2.2 per cent below 2012 levels by 2032. Even in Scotland, where MUP is expected to have had a positive impact on drinking, the group estimated that reintroducing the escalator would have a further positive impact on health there as well.

The group would like to highlight to policy makers the impacts of cuts to alcohol duties and its effect on public health: “Reintroducing the alcohol duty escalator would be an effective way to reduce alcohol consumption and its associated negative effects on public health across the UK in the future,” said Colin.

“We modelled what could happen if the escalator was reintroduced in 2020 and found that this could lead to over 4,700 less alcohol-related deaths and a reduction in alcohol-related hospital admissions which would save the NHS £794 million in total by 2032.”